Monday, December 20, 2010

The Physicality of Zion: Question Two: How will Zion be governed?

Light version:

At any point in history, men and women gathered themselves together – either for protection, or commerce, or simply because their families got really, really big.  In doing so, leadership over the group always seems to form.  When Zion is formed, there will not be an election.  God will choose, and His choices for leaders will fulfill His purposes.  In this there is peace – why?  Because there is no hidden agenda and no hidden cost.  The leadership of Zion will be the best men and women for the job, and they will not be swayed by greed, power, or glory.  They will be working with one end in mind – the betterment of all men.


Full version:

Okay, so the entire topic of the Physicality of Zion arose from the fall out of the last few elections.  The first question: How will Zion be governed? might take a couple weeks to cover.  This is probably a post that will get me into trouble, since I’m combining the two most divisive topics under heaven – politics and religion.  However, in spite of it being a big no-no, I’m going to talk about them anyway.  Eat your spinach first and get it out of the way as it were.

At any point in history, men and women gathered themselves together – either for protection, or commerce, or simply because their families got really, really big.  In doing so, leadership over the group always seems to form.  The leaders were chosen either through their charisma, innate wisdom, strength of arms, or the size of their flocks.  Some were good.  Some were not.  Some were a mixture of both depending on the direction of the wind.  But good or bad, the people demanded that someone take up the lead.  Why?  Lots of reasons, probably; comfort, security…personally though, I think people wanted leaders so that they could have a scapegoat to blame when the crops failed or when things didn’t go the way that the group thought they should.

Whichever the excuse, by nature and spirit, we are beings of order.  We crave guidance and structure.  These desires are leftovers from the lives we lived prior to coming to mortality.  Our collective history has shown us good leaders and bad.  It has shown us where government has worked, and obviously where it has failed miserably.

I will confess that this last election was both, very disappointing and very disheartening.  Not so much for the outcome, but for the content of the campaigns.  For months we watched, listened to, and read about the various candidates.  Here in Jackson County, Missouri, the mudslinging between parties and candidates was harsh.  Likewise, I listened to and watched as vicious attacks unfolded in other states.  More and more, the issues are falling by the wayside and are being replaced by an unhealthy focus on personality and personal failures.

I am not disputing the need for leaders of integrity but, truthfully, I feel that our government has almost completely lost its integrity.  And that is what made me so depressed about this last election.  I no longer feel represented by the candidates that run for office.  And I doubt that I ever will be again.  It is a pessimistic mindset, I know.  Yet, I feel that the current criteria set forth, in order to simply qualify for an accepted candidacy are to blame for the poor choices running for office these days.  The standards for qualification are not leadership and moral integrity.  They are a stocked bank account, the number of powerfully influential people you know, and the ability to tow a party line.  To my mind and heart, it is literally a choice between the lesser of two evils each and every time I cast my ballot any more.

Some will criticize me for my cynicism.  “If you don’t like the system, change it!”  That’s the default, right?  And if one were to look at the recent meteoric rise of the Tea Party Movement, you would think that idiom was truly viable.  Yet, even this political movement, for all of its rhetoric, does not represent my ideals.  To be heard, you need money; lots and lots of money.  And it is in the gathering of that money, that so much compromise is made.

“I’ll endorse you, but I’ll expect you to represent my interests at a later date.”

“I’ll donate to you, but I need you to listen to what this lobbyist has to say first.”

“Here’s a contribution check, now let me introduce you to so-and-so.”

It is how the game is played: you give a little to get a little.  Yet, in complete contrast, that is not how God’s kingdom is run.

Christ, during his mortal ministry, did not go to the wealthy to bank his campaign.  Neither did He seek out those who were deemed wise, or the popular people of the time.  The men he chose were those of integrity, loyalty, and they had high standards.  In each of them, I suspect even Judas in the beginning, there was a reverence for Heavenly Father and His purposes.  The scripture is true: “Many are called, but few are chosen.” (Matt. 22:14)

The leadership of Zion will be chosen not by man, but by God whose city it is.  There is confidence in that.  When our last Bishop was selected from our congregation, I felt comforted.  I knew the man hadn’t aspired to the position.  There was no campaigning, no empty promises, and no embellished speeches.  There was just a man, chosen by God, who quietly bore his testimony and through his actions promised to love us all and do his best for us.  That is the foundation of the leadership of Zion – love God, love his children, and a commitment to do whatever is necessary to get the job done.

There are many reasons why our government fails, but I think the two greatest reasons are its size and the lack of serious integrity and reverence for the commitment within our leadership.  That’s a pretty harsh criticism but, in the defense of our leaders the system has become the proverbial stone, cut from the mountain.  Our governing leadership cannot hope to fight against the sheer momentum of the social, economic, and political structures of power that are currently rooted in the governments of the world.  Some have quietly tried, and have been consumed by it.  True change can only come through a conscious unification between the men and women in leadership; but there are so many different voices and unique interests vying for their attention, how can they possibly draw together under one banner?
The sad fact is: they can’t.

The people of our nation, no…our world, are too divided on how they want to be governed for that to happen.  The early history of the United States is rife with social experimentation and reform.  Emerson was noted to have commented on the fact:

“We are all a little wild here with numberless projects of social reform. Not a reading man but has a draft of a new community in his waistcoat pocket.”
(From a letter to Carlyle in 1840, as cited in Sydney E. Ahlstrom, “The Communitarian Impulse,” A Religious History of the American People, (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1972), p. 491.
The desire was to see a perfect community built, but how could it be with so many disparate visions?  Now, like then, some want to be told how to live and others want to be left alone.  Some want their government to take care of them, and their neighbor wants as little government in his life as possible.  To some, financial security is all important.  To others, the concern is where their next meal is coming from.  The point is, man governing man doesn’t work.  It never has.  Why?

Simply because man does not have the vision to do so; their hearts are not one.  Neither one with each other, nor with God.

If we could see the Big Picture and love, as God does, then we would have a government that works.  Sadly, we get too caught up in our own issues for that to be a viable case.  It’s why every attempt at a utopian government has failed, and it is why they will continue to fail.  The difference between Zion and any other man-made attempt (socialism, communism, or otherwise), is the fact that the leadership of Zion answer to a higher power – a true King.  That King cannot be swayed by greed, anger, vengeance, or fear.  His purpose is perfectly pure, and we know up front that He is working for our joy and benefit.  He has no other ulterior motive.

In this, when he chooses someone to fill the hot seat, we can take comfort in the knowledge that that man or woman is the right person for the job.  There is a reason for them having the position.  And they, as leaders, will not place their faith in themselves.  They will be as Nephi of old:
2 Ne. 4:34
O Lord, I have trusted in thee, and I will trust in thee forever. I will not put my trust in the arm of flesh; for I know that cursed is he that putteth his trust in the arm of flesh. Yea, cursed is he that putteth his trust in man or maketh flesh his arm.
Zion will be governed by its Lord and King, Jesus Christ, who in turn takes his direction directly from the mouth of His Father.  When we place our trust in that more perfect system, we will have an abiding government that is truly successful.  Health care won’t be driven by capitalism, for what need does Heavenly Father have for money?  There will be no homeless or destitute, for with God all men have a purpose and a place.  There won’t be any more hidden agendas or lobbying.  There won’t be any need for anarchists, because our freedoms are assured by the highest power in the universe.

That brings me comfort.  That brings me peace.  I look forward to Zion, if for no other reason than I’ll be free from the mudslinging.

Until next week,
Jeffrey

Sunday, December 12, 2010

The Physicality of Zion: Question One: Is Zion real?

Light version:

Okay.  In my research and meanderings, I came across a particularly frank criticism of the LDS and RLDS faiths; specifically their belief in a truly physical Zion here in the United States.  I won’t name the source here, simply because I found it terribly biased and negative.  It did bring to the forefront of my mind, the fact that a truly physical Zion here in Jackson County, Missouri (or anywhere for that matter) is going to be seen and judged as a fairy tale.  This is mainly due to the fact that so many other attempts at utopian societies have failed miserably over the course of time.  There are other reasons though.

One such reason is that a true Zion, here on the North American continent, is literally a slap in the face of the modern establishment.  The government “for the people and by the people” cannot coexist with Zion.  Zion is God’s city, not man’s.  He makes the rules and He is the ultimate authority.  The semblance of freedom that we enjoy in America and other Democratic states throughout the world will be sacrificed in Zion, for a much better way.  Do not misunderstand, Zion will be a place where freedom is sacred, more so than any other place on Earth.  However, the laws that govern her will be God’s laws, not man’s.  Those who shelter behind her walls, actively choose to live by those tenants.  Those who do not wish to live there, may freely leave at any time they desire.  Heavenly Father asks us to do what is right.  He tells us the benefits and the consequences of the choices laid before us.  He will never force anyone to live His laws.  However, the citizens of His Zion will live by those laws with exactness, because they love their God and choose to abide by His standards.

So, the questions before us are:
•    Is Zion real?
•    Can Zion exist here in the United States, where latter day prophesy says it must?
•    What do the ancient scriptures say about Zion?


Full version:

Okay.  In my research and meanderings, I came across a particularly frank criticism of the LDS and RLDS faiths; specifically their belief in a truly physical Zion here in the United States.  I won’t name the source here, simply because I found it terribly biased and negative.  It did bring to the forefront of my mind the fact that a truly physical Zion here in Jackson County, Missouri (or anywhere for that matter) is going to be seen and judged as a fairy tale.  This is mainly due to the fact that so many other attempts at utopian societies have failed miserably over the course of time.  There are other reasons though.

One such reason is that a true Zion, here on the North American continent, is literally a slap in the face of the modern establishment.  The government “for the people and by the people” cannot coexist with Zion.  Zion is God’s city, not man’s.  He makes the rules and He is the ultimate authority.  The semblance of freedom that we enjoy in America and other Democratic states throughout the world will be sacrificed in Zion, for a much better way.  Do not misunderstand, Zion will be a place where freedom is sacred, more so than any other place on Earth.  However, the laws that govern her will be God’s laws, not man’s.  Those who shelter behind her walls actively choose to live by those tenants.  Those who do not wish to live there may freely leave at any time they desire.  Heavenly Father asks us to do what is right.  He tells us the benefits and the consequences of the choices laid before us.  He will never force anyone to live His laws.  However, the citizens of His Zion will live by those laws with exactness, because they love their God and choose to abide by His standards.

So, the questions before us are:
•    Is Zion real?
•    Can Zion exist here in the United States, where latter-day prophesy says it must?
•    What do the ancient scriptures say about Zion?

There are more questions, many more, but for now I’m going to focus on these three; and we’ll take them in reverse order.

First: “What do the ancient scriptures say about Zion?

Within the King James version of the Bible, there are one hundred and fifty three references to Zion.  David is particularly fond of mentioning Zion in his Psalms (he mentions Zion thirty seven times), and Isaiah refers to it heavily throughout his work as well (forty seven times).  Other ancient prophets from the bible, such as Jeremiah, Micah, and Joel, touch on Zion too.  I do not claim to be a biblical scholar.  I do not understand the nuances of the history, culture, and language that ancient scripture represents.  What I do see represented in these ancient scriptures is a decisive acknowledgement that the concept of Zion was understood and celebrated by the old prophets.

Three scriptures that plainly, at least to my mind, distinguish Zion as a true place are:

Micah 4:2
And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for the law shall go forth of Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.

Isaiah 59:20
And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob, saith the Lord.

Jeremiah 3:14
Turn, O backsliding children, saith the Lord; for I am married unto you: and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion:

Now, if we were to only reference the Old Testament, it would be plain that Zion is a real and physical place.  The Zion of the Old Testament references the City of David, which is Jerusalem.  It is the consecrated City of God, and a holy place, but I ask you this: is it the only City of God?  If there is one, can there not be more?  The answer is a resounding yes!  A city dedicated to God can be built up anywhere, by any of His children.

This is the entire focus of the New Testament.  Jesus Christ taught us how we were supposed to live our lives, in order to qualify for Zion.  The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the law that will govern the Holy City.  It is the standard by which men will live, and the entire reason why Zion will succeed where all other attempts at a utopian community have failed.

Thus, established by ancient scripture, we know that Heavenly Father expects His children to build up a city to Him.  The next question: Can Zion exist here in the United States, where latter-day prophesy says it must?

The establishment of Zion in the heart of the United States seems offensive to many.  How could anyone have the audacity to build up a city to God, in a country built on the tenants of religious freedom for all?  Wouldn’t we be infringing on the rights and freedoms of men and women, just contemplating such an enterprise?  I say yes, and I say no.  Yes, we would be coming together to build a community that believes in living the Gospel of Christ to its fullest expression.  Yes, that would most likely be offensive to various people.  However, as stated above, there is no requirement that states an individual must live in Zion.  The very thought of it may turn the stomachs of some, and they would likely not appreciate the environment growing around them.  Some will fight against it, but I suspect that the majority would simply choose to live elsewhere; someplace that conforms to their ideals.

But that still doesn’t answer the question of whether Zion can exist in Jackson County, Missouri.  The answer to this query hinges on one thing and one thing alone: Was Joseph Smith a prophet of God?  If no, then there is no worry, for such an endeavor is destined to fail, regardless of intent.  God would not support it, and without that support then Zion could never be built.  If yes, if Joseph truly was a prophet of God, then the city must be built, for it was prophesied to happen.

I subscribe to the latter over the former, as do millions of others.  So how, in a country where religion is becoming more and more a bothersome hobby, will such a community be built up?  Line upon line, precept upon precept.  There are many instructions and prophesies concerning the building of Zion in the Doctrine and Covenants.  In D&C 101:17, it states:

Zion shall not be moved out of her place, notwithstanding her children are scattered.

The Saints were driven from Missouri, and scattered across the face of the continent.  Yet, Zion remains dedicated.  In the next verse (D&C 101:18) the Lord goes on to qualify that there will be a return.

They that remain, and are pure in heart, shall return, and come to their inheritances, they and their children, with songs of everlasting joy, to build up the waste places of Zion—

I find this scripture to be interesting, mainly because of the imagery in the last part of the scripture.  The pure in heart, and their children shall return “to build up the waste places of Zion…”  Now, I will freely admit that I am speculating here, and my interpretation may not be certain, so receive this in the spirit it is given.  No city is built overnight.  It takes time to build up a community.  Some believe that there will be some great cataclysm that will come and lay waste to the city, and it will be the Saints that rebuild it.  That very well may be true, but I have an alternate theory; one that can coexist with this point of view, or stand on its own.

It is my interpretation that God will gather together his children, those of like mind and pure hearts, slowly over the course of years and generations.  I submit He has already been doing so, for many years now.  The community of the Saints will continue to grow as the Lord needs and, as it does, the spirit of that community will slowly build to become more unified with God’s needs and spirit.  The undesirable “waste places” will be transformed into a beautiful community.  The laws and interests of the community will shift with the hearts of the people, and Zion will gradually blossom like a rose.  Such a gradual change requires the leadership of the priesthood, and an intimate trust in God’s purposes.  It requires unifying ourselves underneath God’s banner, setting aside personal desires and tired traditions.

But what of the opposition to such an initiative?  How can we justify supplanting an entire community?  Isn’t that what got the Saints driven from Missouri in the first place?  I find myself asking these questions a great deal.  Currently, I don’t really have any hard answers to these questions.  I have ideas, but no hard facts.  There has always been opposition to God’s work, and there likely always will be.  It is a necessary thing; otherwise the achievement of Zion would be meaningless.

The second question has always worried me yet, as I sit here and write this, the Spirit whispers that there need be no justification, because there will be no displacement.  Zion will be built by like-minded and like-hearted people that God has gathered from the four corners of the Earth.  They won’t all be LDS, (not at first ;)…) but they will be people who desire the same thing: a place of peace and safety.  From there everything will build and grow until the true Zion comes to fruition.

Heavenly Father alone knows how Zion will be built.  Whether the United States needs to suffer some calamity, just as the Nephites did prior to the visit of the Savior to this hemisphere, or Zion comes to pass slowly, in a gradual evolution – it doesn’t matter.  What does matter is the last question: Is Zion real?  I submit that Zion is as real as we desire it to be.  Some will scoff and deride Joseph Smith for even dreaming of such an idea, but I counter their defamation with the question: Why not?  What more laudable goal can mankind aspire to, than to build a city of such beauty and perfection that God Himself would feel welcome and comfortable walking its streets?

Is Zion real?  Yes.  Resoundingly, YES!

Until next week,

Jeffrey

Sunday, December 05, 2010

The Physicality of Zion: Introduction

Light version:
In my studies of Zion, I came across a very interesting fact.  I stumbled upon it in passing and it shocked me to a great degree.  Did you know that Zion must be established before the second coming of the Lord?  In fact, the Lord will not come until it is founded.  Here’s the reference:
Doctrine and Covenants 49: 24-25

24  But before the great day of the Lord shall come, Jacob shall flourish in the wilderness, and the Lamanites shall blossom as the rose.
25  Zion shall flourish upon the hills and rejoice upon the mountains, and shall be assembled together unto the place which I have appointed.
I know I’ve run across this reference before, and yet it didn’t have the same impact as it had on me recently.  Think about it.  The Lord cannot return until Zion is built.  That’s a prophesy, just as real as any other in the scriptures.  It brings new light to the mission of every prophet that has come after Christ’s resurrection.  Everything that they have done, everything that they have worked towards has been in fulfillment of that goal.

So, I set myself to pondering and dreaming some more over the last month.  The question: “What does Zion look like, physically?”


Full version:
In my studies of Zion, I came across a very interesting fact.  I stumbled upon it in passing and it shocked me to a great degree.  Did you know that Zion must be established before the second coming of the Lord?  In fact, the Lord will not come until it is founded.  Here’s the reference:
Doctrine and Covenants 49: 24-25

24  But before the great day of the Lord shall come, Jacob shall flourish in the wilderness, and the Lamanites shall blossom as the rose.
25  Zion shall flourish upon the hills and rejoice upon the mountains, and shall be assembled together unto the place which I have appointed.
I know I’ve run across this reference before, and yet it didn’t have the same impact as it had on me recently.  Think about it.  The Lord cannot return until Zion is built.  That’s a prophesy, just as real as any other in the scriptures.  It brings new light to the mission of every prophet that has come after Christ’s resurrection.  Everything that they have done, everything that they have worked towards has been in fulfillment of that goal.

The latter day prophets, especially Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, have made this a singular focus in their lives.  Joseph’s Nauvoo, Far West, and Kirtland were all predecessors…physical attempts at laying the practice of Zion, preparing the saints for the day that they would create God’s City in Jackson County Missouri.  Likewise, Brigham Young did the same when he used Joseph’s plans for Zion to layout the City of Salt Lake.  And those plans were used to build many other communities by the saints over the years, fulfilling the first part of the prophesy in Doctrine and Covenants section 49:25:
“Zion shall flourish upon the hills and rejoice upon the mountains…”
Yet, it is the latter part of the prophesy that has settled so heavily on my heart.  “…and [Zion] shall be assembled together unto the place which I have appointed.”  The language used is interesting when you break it down.  Take the words “assembled together” – it brings to mind an idea that Zion will come together like a three dimensional puzzle, piece by piece.  While pondering it, the image of an engine – car or otherwise, came to my mind.  Zion is the force from which the Gospel of Christ flows, and it must be assembled carefully with each part taking its place in order and perfection, for the Kingdom of God to flourish.

The second set of words that jumped out at me were: “unto the place” – this implies that these pieces will be gathered together from different places.  This brings me to believe that these “pieces” are in reality people.  People who have perfected or excel at certain tasks – leadership, organization, missionary work, teachers, doctors, and the list goes on and on.  Yet, the one common factor that will bind all the disparate parts together is the desire to see Zion built physically. Lastly, is the phrase “which I have appointed” – meaning that Heavenly Father has reserved a physical location for this all to take place.  My lovely wife pointed out that Zion is as much a state of mind as it is a physical place; which I feel the first half of the scripture focuses on specifically.  Zion will be built in many places all over the world – in the “hills” and “mountains” and “wilderness.”  However, there is a place reserved for the City of Zion, the New Jerusalem:
Doctrine and Covenants 57:2-3

2  Wherefore, this is the land of promise, and the place for the city of Zion.
3  And thus saith the Lord your God, if you will receive wisdom here is wisdom. Behold, the place which is now called Independence is the center place; and a spot for the temple is lying westward, upon a lot which is not far from the courthouse.
This is the focus of my studies.  We amy build Zion in our homes, and within our hearts; and this is the first step to seeing God’s City becoming a reality.  Everything that is built in reality, is first built within the hearts and dreams of men.  Building Zion from the spirit of a dream and breathing life into it requires a solid commitment.  It also requires us to be educated in what Zion needs to become. 

So, I set myself to pondering and dreaming some more over the last month.  The question: “What does Zion look like, physically?”  This inevitably led to other questions:
•    How does it differ from other communities?
•    What is the governing body look like and how is it organized?
•    What of its economy?
•    Would there be industry and a modern infrastructure like we enjoy today?
•    What about technology and technological advancements?
•    How would education work?
•    What will our children learn?
•    What about higher studies?
•    Would education be geared towards careers, as they are in today’s world?
•    And what about the community of Zion?
•    What will our houses look like?
•    Will we have policemen to keep the peace?
•    What about social interaction and entertainment, will there be holidays or movies?
•    What about dating?
•    Will there be medical insurance and other institutions like it that impact the community?
So many questions…and more besides.  Over the next few months, I’m probably going to explore a number of these questions.  They may or may not be organized in any particular order, but I feel that it is a good mental exercise.  As I said before: In order to make Zion a reality, we must first visualize and understand it before we can apply it.

I will be looking to the scriptures, and the documented words of the prophets as my study guides.  And encourage those who read this to do the same.  Help me out by checking my facts.  Toss out your own discoveries, and ask your own questions.  Let’s see if we can paint a picture of God’s Zion, and then begin to assemble it piece by piece by recognizing our place in this massive multi-dimensional puzzle.

Until next week,

Jeffrey